So Microsoft released a preview of Windows 8.1 on Wednesday, and of course my bleeding edge heart was quick to install it on two of my computers. I made the mistake of and ignored the warning against installing it on my work computer. I learned the hard way that Enterprise Edition requires the CD to upgrade (as I think it takes you to Professional Edition), and I ended up having to reinstall all of my software, but at least it was a good opportunity to have a clean slate. My regular edition of Windows 8 upgraded just fine, with everything in tact.
I don’t know how, but Microsoft managed to make the Start Screen worse. When they announced it was a button, I realized that they were not bringing the menu back, but it still seems like the interface was hacked together. at the last minute. When I set up my desktop, I like to put my taskbar on the top of the screen, yet there’s no way to configure the start menu to come in from anywhere but the bottom. Now I have start buttons in two corners of the screen, basically eliminating the quick-switch on the upper left hand corner. However, in re-sorting all of my programs, so that my desktop that was previously out of the left hand side, it’s all the way to the right. It just seems pretty half-baked. At least you can boot directly to the desktop now, and the people at StarDock have already released a beta version of Start8 that restores the functionality I’ve enjoyed. Start8 was still the best $5 I’ve ever spent. I’m looking forward to playing with 8.1 some more to see what else they’ve (hopefully) improved.
I took my first Instagram video this evening, and the interface was awesome. Pretty much the only feature that I’m missing from Vine is the ability to embed videos in other web pages (like my blog), but that should only be a matter of time. You can tell Vine is in a panic mode, even before this story about Vine shares plummeting since InstaVine showed up last week. They’re backed into a corner, and are swinging in every direction, pushing out 2 updates in the same week after not pushing out for three weeks they were released their Android version. I’m not sure what Vine can do to save themselves at this point, except for making their app experience more compelling than Instagram. Maybe they can be the first ones to introduce the novel concept of allowing people to mute videos on playback. I still believe that Vine’s demise is the result of a repressed desire to have a quality video app on Android.
Well that was quick, Adobe’s vaunted new Creative Cloud has already been pirated. I thought one of the benefits of their rental-only model was that it would curb piracy, but it doesn’t appear to be the case. I despise Creative Cloud, and it’s not because I support piracy or fear the future – but rather that it takes away Adobe’s incentive to improve their software, no longer compelling you to buy the next version. Subscription services like Creative Cloud (and Office 365 similarly) are to software what “Green” is to company revenues: it’s about making money while trying to appear forward-thinking. Software manufactures are enticed by the constant revenue streams these rental models provide. As they project revenue, they can count on your $50 per month regardless of whether they put out good releases that month or not. They can talk all they want about how this enables them to continue to push out constant updates, but in reality it’ll allow them to grow complacent and justify replacing innovative updates with incremental bolt-tightening updates. The worst part about is is that you can spend $600 over a year and should you decide to cancel your account, you have nothing to show for it. At least when you bought the software, you have an (albeit outdated) version that you own.
While driving home tonight, that "Carolina" country song by Parmalee came on, where he rattles off those state names. I like that song for the most part, except for the fact that he doesn’t specify North or South Carolina – which got me thinking: which state names can also double as names for people (mainly girls)?
After committing some thought, here is my proposed list:
Acceptable (and Even Pretty) Names:
Borderline, but still acceptable
California (in the form of "Cali")
Can’t Be Considered
Any state that starts with "New" (New Mexico, New York, New Jersey, New Hampshire)
Any state that doesn’t end in "a"
Do you know anyone who has a name from the above list (or perhaps even someone whose name wasn’t made the list)?
When judging greatness, one of the things I like to do is to make a “Mt. Rushmore” of things, allowing for the categorization of greatness, rather than having to deal with ranking. Of course, all of this is subjective and is really done to foster discussion. Please feel free to participate in the conversation!
Being on baby watch, we’ve been keeping a low profile and catching up on movies. Today we watched Flight (which was a good – but not entertaining – movie), which spurned the following dinnertime conversation between Bethany and I: is Denzel Washington one of the greatest actors of the last generation? After coming to the conclusion that he was, we then attempted to figure out which actors would be included with Denzel as one of the greatest, resulting in the Mt. Rushmore of actors below.
Criteria and Overall Impressions
We took the last 20 years into account, so a resume quasi-1993 and after
With one exception, we took all actors over 60 out of consideration (eliminating Morgan Freeman, Jack Nicolson and anyone who starred in Godfather)
Actors are permitted to start in TV, but must be primarily considered movie starts today
While relevant, awards are not the primary criteria. We’re basically looking at star power, using the following scenario: Seeing a preview with this actor would give you reason enough to see the movie
We’re looking at the overall body of work, so while they may no longer be at the peak of their popularity, they’re still relevant today and have been for all of their career or the greater part of 20 years – whichever is greater.
To make the initial list we couldn’t look at our phones, if you have to dig into stats for the actor, then they’re not worth being on the list
They’ve starred in movies that for better or worse, have remained culturally relevant
Taking this criteria into account, we set out with our goal of making two Mt. Rushmore’s, consisting of 4 actors and 4 actresses. Both were difficult in their own way. For the men, it was extremely difficult drawing the line between the first tier and second tier. For the women, it exposed a significant problem with the movie industry: it’s extremely difficult for an actress to have a long career. Part of it has to do with the fact that Hollywood doesn’t know how to write modern middle-aged women. Looking back on the last 20 years, most hot commodity actresses had careers like Runningbacks: Untouchable for a period of 3-5 years, then just fizzled out and haven’t done anything memorable recently. Names that have come to mind include Cameron Diaz, Halle Berry, Natalie Portman, and Rachel McAdams, with the jury still out on relative newcomers like Anne Hathaway and Jennifer Lawrence.
For better or worse, cinema reflects society’s values and even though we’ve made great strides in gender equality, people are not going to accept a version of Flight with the pilot being played by a woman, or a female version of Walter White or Don Draper. To make matters worse, there seems to be a shortage of great roles for women older than 30 – at least until you reach the age to play an adult’s mother or grandmother. It’s really sad when you think of it. Thus, I had a really hard time coming up with a 4th Actress Rushmore spot, and made the controversial move of giving it away to the men, who I couldn’t whittle from 5 to 4. I know it doesn’t make sense, but please make a case for another actress.
So without further ado, here are my Mt. Rushmore’s of modern movie starts:
Even though we’re not doing rankings, if we were: Meryl would top the list of actresses and probably lap anyone else. She may be just over 60, but she’s the one for which I made an exception. Her resume from the last 20 years is just that impressive. She was huge before 1993 and since then added another 8 Oscars, winning one of them last year for The Iron Lady.
Strongest Movies: The Iron Lady, Julie & Julia, The Devil Wears Prada, Mama Mia! (plus a ton of other movies) Movies That Potentially Hurt Her Chances (setting back her career): None
It could be argued that Julia peaked with Pretty Woman, but since 1993 has remained culturally relevant for the better parts of two decades. She may make most her money on “chick flicks”, but those are usually the movies you have on your bookshelf.
Strongest Movies: Eat Pray Love, Charlie Wilson’s War, Erin Brockovich, Ocean’s 11 Movies That Potentially Hurt Her Chances: Ocean’s 12, Valentine’s Day
I personally can’t stand her, but she has managed to stay relevant for the better part of 20 years, topping it off with her Oscar from the Blind Side. She probably got a lot of sympathy mileage from the way she thanked her (unbeknownst at the time) cheating husband during her Oscar speech.
Strongest Movies: Speed, The Net, Miss Congeniality, Crash (at the time), The Blind Side Movies That Potentially Hurt Her Chances: Crash (in retrospect), Speed 2: Cruise Control
Although Tom’s been in relative obscurity playing Robert Langdon, Tom Hanks got so much mileage from the first half of this generation that he still doesn’t have to buy a beer ever again.
Strongest Movies: Forrest Gump, Apollo 13, Toy Story, You’ve Got Mail, Charlie Wilson’s War, Saving Private Ryan, Road to Perdition, Cast Away, The Green Mile, Philadelphia Movies That Potentially Hurt His Chances: The Da Vinci Code (but only because it’s controversial)
While Clooney spent the first part of this generation doing TV, he pretty much embodies the modern movie star. Out of anyone on this list, he’s probably the guy you could talk to over a beer (except for maybe Tom Hanks). When people dream about becoming cool movie stars, they think of George Clooney. Just get him on your top bill for your movie and it’ll be a hit.
Strongest Movies: Ocean’s 11, Up in the Air, Syriana, Good Night and Good Luck, Three Kings, The Descendants Movies That Potentially Hurt His Chances: Ocean’s 12, Spy Kids, Batman & Robin
Depp may owe the revitalization of his career to Pirates, but he’s taken advantage of every opportunity, to the point that you’ll be in the theater to see whatever he’s making, even if it’s utter crap.
Strongest Movies: Pirates of the Caribbean, The Tourist, The Rum Diary, Sweeney Todd, Don Juan DeMarco Movies That Potentially Hurt His Chances: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Dark Shadows
Denzel can pretty much add credibility to any movie that you see. Any time I see a trailer with him in it, my first thought is “Oh Denzel’s in it, so it has to be good”. Even if it’s not, you’ll usually end up saying that at least his performance was good.
Strongest Movies: American Gangster, Inside Man, Man on Fire, Training Day, Remember The Titans, The Hurricane, The Bone Collector, Courage Under Fire, Philadelphia, Crimson Tide Movies That Potentially Hurt His Chances: The Book of Eli
When I was in high school, I hated Leonardo DiCaprio for subjecting all of us to Titanic, but dude was smart. Making that date movie pretty much insured that he could star in any picture he wanted – and took that its fullest advantage, rattling off a resume that looks like a Greatest Hits album.
Strongest Movies: Django Unchained, Inception, Shutter Island, Blood Diamond, The Departed, The Aviator, Catch Me If You Can, Gangs of New York, The Beach, Titanic, Romeo + Juliet Movies That Potentially Hurt His Chances: What’s Eating Gilbert Grape (which made him a punch-line for Titanic-haters), The Man in the Iron Mask
So yes, my Mt. Rushmore stole an actress spot and gave it to an actor, but let me ask you this: which one of these five would you take off the list? As far as actresses: who would you add? Would you have a different list all together? Let me know who would be on your Mt. Rushmore!
Well after nearly 10 months, it’s finally here – or at least it’s supposed to be. Ever since we’ve announced that we’re expecting our first child, I’ve been a little mum about the subject on my blog, for two main reasons: we’ve been a little unsure and uncomfortable sharing some of the information (as in we *think* we’re having a girl), and I also have been hypersensitive about using my blog to share pretty typical pregnancy things (especially since I’m not the one personally experiencing them).
Today is the official due date for the baby, although as we’re approaching 10pm, the likelihood of Baby Balderrama arriving today is pretty slim. It’s funny, it seems like those 40 weeks have breezed by (especially as things got really busy in the spring), but these last few days have felt excruciatingly long. We’re extremely hesitant to make any plans that take us too far away from home, and we can’t help but think ahead and get excited about the baby arriving.
It’s funny, you realize people are being curious and caring by asking questions, but it starts getting old providing the same answers: No, she’s not here yet. Yes, we’re still pregnant. Yes, we want her to get here too. Yes we’re doing <Insert wives tale to induce labor>, but it hasn’t worked yet. Not to be crass, but trust us: when our baby arrives we’ll make sure that you know! Hopefully it’s going to be soon!